Skip to main content
Storm Season
Zero electricity costs, even in emergenciesDon't get caught in the darkBe prepared
Back to Blog
CouncilsActive TransportJanuary 21, 20267 min read

Bike Path Edge Marking: Why Councils Are Choosing Photoluminescent

Australian councils face a fundamental challenge: community demand for safe cycling infrastructure exceeds available funding. Shared path construction costs vary widely depending on terrain, land acquisition, and design. Adding traditional lighting infrastructure increases cost and disruption. Photoluminescent edge marking offers a different equation.

Shared bike path at dusk with LuminoKrom photoluminescent edge markings glowing neon green

High

Path construction costs vary widely by location and scope

Material

Lighting infrastructure adds significant cost and disruption

Lower

Photoluminescent marking avoids electrical infrastructure

The Funding Landscape

Active transport infrastructure is receiving unprecedented government investment. But the funding must stretch across substantial infrastructure needs:

Federal

National Active Transport Fund

$100 million over 4 years (2025-2028)

For construction and upgrade of bicycle and walking paths across Australia

Queensland

Active Transport Investment

$315 million over 4 years

Significant expansion and upgrade of state bike routes

Victoria

Safe Cycling Network (estimated)

$400-600 million over 10 years

Infrastructure Victoria estimate for Melbourne and regional cities

The $100 million National Active Transport Fund sounds substantial, but it must be spread across many local and regional projects. Every cost-saving measure matters.

The Night Visibility Cost Challenge

Community expectations increasingly include after-dark safety. But traditional path lighting adds significant cost layers:

Traditional Electrical Lighting

  • Poles and luminairesVaries by design
  • Trenching and cablingVaries by site conditions
  • Electrical connection feesVaries by utility
  • Annual electricityOngoing operational cost
  • Annual maintenanceOngoing maintenance cost

First km: Site-dependent

Ongoing: Ongoing costs

Photoluminescent Marking

  • Material and applicationPremium marking rates
  • No trenching required$0
  • No electrical connection$0
  • Annual electricity$0
  • MaintenanceLower ongoing cost

First km: Lower infrastructure burden

Ongoing: Minimal energy costs

Benefits for Council Infrastructure

Dramatically Lower Capital Cost

No trenching, no poles, no electrical infrastructure. Application is a marking exercise, not a civil works project.

Zero Ongoing Electricity

Charges from sunlight, glows at night. No power connection, no electricity bills, no metering.

Dark-Sky Compliant

Soft ambient glow produces far less light than powered lighting. Suitable for paths through parks and sensitive areas when designed carefully.

Wildlife Friendly

Low-intensity marking can reduce wildlife disturbance compared to powered lighting, especially with careful placement.

Storm Resilient

No electrical components to fail during power outages. Paths remain visible when surrounding infrastructure goes dark.

10-Hour Night Visibility

Charges during daylight and glows through the night when fully charged.

Where Photoluminescent Makes Sense

Greenway Through Park

Challenge: Path runs through natural area where poles and lighting would be visually intrusive and environmentally disruptive

Solution: Photoluminescent edge marking provides wayfinding without infrastructure impact

Remote Path Sections

Challenge: Shared path passes through areas distant from electrical grid, making connection costs prohibitive

Solution: No electrical infrastructure required — mark and walk away

Budget-Constrained Extensions

Challenge: Funding covers path construction but not lighting infrastructure

Solution: Photoluminescent marking stretches budget to cover more kilometres with night visibility

Flood-Prone Areas

Challenge: Coastal or riverside paths where electrical infrastructure faces flood and storm damage risk

Solution: No electrical components to damage; marking resurfaces as water recedes

Retrofit Existing Paths

Challenge: Established shared paths lack night visibility; retrofitting lighting is disruptive and expensive

Solution: Add photoluminescent edge marking with minimal path closure

Australian Deployment

Photoluminescent bike path marking is no longer theoretical for Australian councils:

Blacktown City Council

NSWFirst Oceania LuminoKrom deployment (2024)

Photoluminescent edge marking on bike paths — Australia's first council installation of LuminoKrom technology.

Implementation Considerations

Not a Replacement for All Lighting

Photoluminescent marking provides wayfinding and edge definition, not illumination. It's ideal for paths but may need supplementation at high-activity nodes (intersections, seats, equipment).

Application Rate Matters

Minimum 900 g/m² is required for optimal glow duration. Under-application results in reduced visibility and shorter glow time.

Surface Condition

Like all road marking, surface preparation affects adhesion and longevity. New asphalt is ideal; older surfaces may need treatment.

Procurement Path

LuminoKrom is applied by line marking contractors. Councils can specify photoluminescent marking in tenders or approach contractors who have partnered with Tarsior.

For Council Officers: Getting Started

  1. 1Identify pilot locations — Look for path sections where lighting infrastructure is cost-prohibitive or environmentally problematic. Greenways through parks are ideal first projects.
  2. 2Request a site assessment — Contact Tarsior to discuss your specific path conditions and receive technical guidance on application requirements.
  3. 3Include in tender specifications — For upcoming path projects, consider specifying photoluminescent edge marking as an option or requirement for sections without electrical lighting.
  4. 4Plan community engagement — Photoluminescent paths generate significant community interest. Plan a dusk unveiling event to showcase the transformation from day to night visibility.

Key Takeaways

  • Shared path costs vary widely by location, design, and approvals
  • Photoluminescent marking avoids electrical infrastructure on unlit paths
  • Federal and state governments have committed hundreds of millions to active transport infrastructure through 2028
  • Photoluminescent marking produces low-intensity light compared to powered lighting
  • Blacktown City Council installed Australia's first LuminoKrom bike path deployment in 2024

Sources & References

[1]
National Active Transport FundDepartment of Infrastructure, TransportView source
[2]
Active Transport Funding to Get Australians MovingDepartment of InfrastructureView source
[3]
Option Identification - Active TravelAustralian Transport Assessment and PlanningView source
[4]
LuminoKrom Bike Lane Luminescent MarkingsOliKrom / LuminoKromView source
[5]
Photoluminescent road marking for safe mobility at nightScienceDirect / Transportation Research ProcediaView source
[6]
Active Transport Funding BoostBicycle NetworkView source

Ready to Explore Photoluminescent Marking?

Contact Tarsior to discuss LuminoKrom for your council's bike paths and shared trails. We provide technical assessments, product specifications, and can connect you with experienced applicators.

This article was researched and written with the assistance of AI tools. While we strive for accuracy and cite official sources, information may change. We recommend verifying critical details with relevant authorities. This content is for general information only and does not constitute professional advice. Some links in this article may be affiliate links — if you purchase through them, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you, which helps support our content. See our Terms & Conditions for full disclaimer.